{[['']]}
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Social Media Spurs the Cancellation of the New York City Marathon
Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced the cancellation of the
New York City Marathon late Friday afternoon.
For the first time in 42 years, more than 45,000 runners from across the globe
will not be crossing the finish line in Central Park on Sunday afternoon.
Though Bloomberg originally stated that the marathon would still go on, to show
that New York City was not defeated by Hurricane Sandy, vocal protests from his constituents and fellow politicians such as former Mayor Giuliani spurred an
eleventh hour change of plans. Social media, in particular, played a huge roll
in organizing petitions supporting the cancellation of the marathon. Those who
wanted cancellation asked why police –more than 1000 of which were dispatched
to help with the 2011 marathon- should be diverted from recovery efforts at a
time when many in the five boroughs still had no power, heat, or safe water to
drink. Similarly, supporters of cancellation argued that supplies such as
generators, food, blankets, and bottled water could be diverted from the
marathon and used to help those who had been affected by Hurricane Sandy.
Almost 30,000 people signed a Change.org petition calling on Mayor Michael
Bloomberg and the CEO of the New York Road Runners Association, Mary
Wittenberg, to cancel the marathon. Upward of 45,000 people took to Facebook to
show their support for cancellation, and people vocalized their opinions on the
official pages for both the New York Road Runners and the New York Marathon. Social
media is quickly becoming a key way in which we, as a country, integrate
classical Greek ideas about democracy into our American political system.
Philosophers such as Aristotle, who believed that man is "a political
animal" –that we are at our most human when we participate in politics-
thought that the ideal democracy would be one in which all citizens gathered to
face the challenges presented by living in a collective. In America, what we
have most closely resembles a trusteeship vision of democracy, or one in which
we elect officials to debate and make political decisions for the collective
society. Social media presents the public with a way to easily engage in
political causes, and make their opinions known, effectively giving it a
greater say in the political process. While it's unclear whether Aristotle
would have considered Twitter and Facebook to be legitimate forms of political
contribution, there is no doubt that they provide a platform for the public to
make its opinions known.
Rate this posting: